Which statement is correct about the rejection of claims?

The statement that final rejections do not allow for new claims is accurate within the context of patent prosecution. When a final rejection is issued by the patent examiner, it signifies that the examiner has reached a determination that the claims as presented are not allowable. Under the rules of patent examination, in response to a final rejection, the applicant is limited in their options. Specifically, they may only amend previously presented claims or seek to argue against the examiner's findings, but they cannot introduce new claims that were not part of the original application or earlier filings.

This restriction on introducing new claims after a final rejection is critical in maintaining the efficiency of the patent examination process. The purpose is to ensure that the examiner can make a final determination based on the claims that were actually under examination, thus avoiding unnecessary delays caused by the introduction of new claims at that stage.

Other options regarding the amendment of claims after rejection are less precise because they imply different allowances that are not consistent with the rules governing final rejections. Therefore, the clarity and precision of the statement regarding final rejections reinforces its correctness.