When can you deliberately slow down proceedings at the PTO?

Deliberately slowing down proceedings at the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) is permissible if there is good and sufficient cause. This means that an applicant must present a valid reason, which could involve needing more time to respond to office actions, conduct further research, or negotiate with third parties. This provision is important because it ensures that the applicant has the opportunity to adequately prepare their case or response, which contributes to a more thorough examination of the application.

Other situations, like final office actions or being in litigation, do not inherently provide a valid basis for delaying proceedings without a justified reason. In fact, a final office action indicates a point where the PTO has made a determination on the patentability of the claims, which may limit the opportunities for delay. Similarly, simply being in litigation does not exempt an applicant from complying with the timelines set by the PTO unless there is a demonstrated need to synchronize patent proceedings with ongoing court matters. Therefore, the best and most inclusive option for slowing down proceedings while adhering to PTO regulations is having good and sufficient cause.