What two responses can you give to a rejection issued by the PTO?

In the context of responding to a rejection issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), the correct choice highlights the formal procedures available to applicants. When a rejection occurs, applicants have the option to either appeal the decision to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) or file a petition for reconsideration.

An appeal allows the applicant to contest the PTO's rejection, leading to a review by the PTAB. This process is established in the patent law framework, providing a structured means for applicants to challenge adverse decisions regarding patentability.

On the other hand, a petition may be filed to request various forms of relief or reconsideration from the PTO. This could involve asking the examiner to re-evaluate the rejection based on new arguments or evidence not previously considered.

The other possible responses listed do not encompass the official avenues recognized by the PTO. For instance, options like objection or assurance do not represent standard responses to rejections in the patent process. Similarly, while clarification or amendment could be actions taken during an examination phase, they do not capture the formal procedures for responding to a rejection as required by the PTO's processes. Lastly, requesting or reviewing lacks the specificity tied to appealing or petitioning, which are the structured responses defined in patent