What are the two possible outcomes if joint inventors disagree about revoking a practitioner's power of attorney?

The correct answer addresses the necessity for consent among all joint inventors when it comes to significant decisions that affect the patent application process. In patent law, particularly in joint inventorship scenarios, decisions such as revoking a power of attorney are considered collaborative actions that typically require the agreement of all inventors.

The rationale behind requiring signatures from all inventors or allowing action to be taken by one with appropriate justification stems from the principle of joint authorship and allegiance to ensuring that all inventors have a say in managing the legal aspects of the patent application. This prevents any single inventor from unilaterally making decisions that could negatively impact the rights of the other inventors involved.

Moreover, this approach fosters transparency and communication among the inventors, maintaining the integrity of the collaborative process essential in joint inventions.

In contrast, the incorrect answers suggest ideas that may undermine the collaborative nature of joint inventorship or imply a lack of accountability among inventors. For example, the notion that only one inventor can revoke power without the other’s agreement overlooks the principle that joint inventors share ownership and rights, which extends to decision-making processes affecting the patent.