True or False: You can submit a claim for priority to overcome certain prior art rejections even if it was not previously made in the application.

The statement is true because applicants can submit a claim for priority to overcome prior art rejections at any point during the examination process, even if it was not initially included in the application. This is particularly relevant when trying to assert priority based on an earlier filing date of a related application that could help establish the novelty of the claimed invention.

This strategic move is often utilized to argue against the relevance of prior art that was cited during prosecution by demonstrating that the applicant's invention was disclosed in an earlier application, thus potentially changing the outcome of the examination. It is important to adhere to all relevant rules and requirements when making such a claim, but the flexibility to introduce a priority claim can be critical for overcoming challenges encountered during the patent examination process.

Other choices may imply restrictions or conditions that do not reflect the true flexibility granted under patent law in terms of asserting priority.