In amended cases, what is required for claims to be allowed?

The requirement for claims to be allowed in amended cases is centered on the concept of patentability, specifically the necessity for the applicant to clearly articulate the patentable novelty of their claims. This means that the applicant must identify what makes their invention distinct from prior art, thereby demonstrating how it satisfies the criteria for patentability, which include novelty and non-obviousness. By pointing out the patentable novelty, the applicant helps the examiner understand the unique aspects of the invention that warrant patent protection.

While the clarity and simplicity of language in claims can contribute to their understanding, it is not a formal requirement tied directly to the allowance of claims. The scope of claims is also important, but they do not necessarily need to be broad; instead, they should adequately cover the inventive concept without being overly limiting. Finally, while including multiple claims can be beneficial for a complete application, it is not a requisite for the allowance of claims in general. Therefore, emphasizing the patentable novelty is crucial and directly aligns with the requirements of the patent examination process.